<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should media sites ditch low-value readers? (Or boost the value of their content?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freelanceunbound.com/2009/11/29/should-media-sites-ditch-low-value-readers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freelanceunbound.com/2009/11/29/should-media-sites-ditch-low-value-readers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:55:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Castello</title>
		<link>http://www.freelanceunbound.com/2009/11/29/should-media-sites-ditch-low-value-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Castello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freelanceunbound.com/?p=2410#comment-692</guid>
		<description>As far as journalism is concerned, I tend to believe that the people at &quot;the top&quot; have the most to lose from peer-to-peer and citizen journalism. People like Murdoch have made their fortunes essentially using news to sell pieces of paper - and now that news can be transmitted without paper, he&#039;s got a lot less to sell.

I think we&#039;ll see a lot of changes in how journalism works:
-Interested persons undertaking the investigation of specific issues simply as a hobby, and producing quality reporting.
-Organizations striving to present clear information as part of their mission (environment, earmarks, etc.).
-Newspapers focusing less on hype and more on local events and goings-on, returning to their roots as community publications.

There&#039;s going to be upheaval, of course, but I believe that good journalism will continue and that talented individuals will still be able to earn a living doing what they do best - they just might have to think more outside the box than they were expecting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as journalism is concerned, I tend to believe that the people at &#8220;the top&#8221; have the most to lose from peer-to-peer and citizen journalism. People like Murdoch have made their fortunes essentially using news to sell pieces of paper &#8211; and now that news can be transmitted without paper, he&#8217;s got a lot less to sell.</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;ll see a lot of changes in how journalism works:<br />
-Interested persons undertaking the investigation of specific issues simply as a hobby, and producing quality reporting.<br />
-Organizations striving to present clear information as part of their mission (environment, earmarks, etc.).<br />
-Newspapers focusing less on hype and more on local events and goings-on, returning to their roots as community publications.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s going to be upheaval, of course, but I believe that good journalism will continue and that talented individuals will still be able to earn a living doing what they do best &#8211; they just might have to think more outside the box than they were expecting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
